Directional cross

Seed PL-181 → Pollen PL-206 · Surface relief and growth habit

Surface relief and growth habit

Proposed not yet attemptedDirection: Seed to pollen

A proposed pairing does not establish compatibility, inherited traits, a completed attempt or future availability. Each direction is evaluated separately.

The research intention

A distinctive texture hypothesis, but neither exact parent is proven reproductively usable. Large useful plants remain eligible; no compactness filter.

Feasibility assessment: Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed
Recorded attempts: 0
Recorded cohorts: 0
Observed outcomes: No PPS outcomes recorded
PPS next step: Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.
Commercial availability: Not yet offered
Last recorded update: Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Radicans x Luxurians XL

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

hj0735 moody x Veitchii

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Evidence reference
RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type
controlled genetic study
Applicability
related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
Table2 p712
Offspring evidence
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale
Original Methods and outcome table available.
Supporting sources
Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium
Author
["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1976-11
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location
JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Study design
Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
A. triangulum♀×A. digitatum♂ yielded a vigorous sterile hybrid; the reciprocal produced weak seedlings that died early.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Evidence reference
RE-136eb1fe82f0a3813b062ba0
Source type
controlled genetic study
Applicability
distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
Not a PPS velvet-leaf pairing; does not identify the cause of directionality.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph
Offspring evidence
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale
Original reciprocal paragraph read.
Supporting sources
Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium
Author
["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1976-11
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location
JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Study design
Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
Anthurium commonly shows marked protogyny, with species differences in floral phases, stigmatic fluid and pollen presentation.Traceable observational record · Applicability: related lineage · Flower-event timing for PPS plants.
Evidence reference
RE-b2249f93f3fac28d3f01cc96
Source type
traceable observational record
Applicability
related lineage · Flower-event timing for PPS plants.
Studied material
Living Anthurium species
Organ
flowers/spadix
Generation
adult reproductive phase
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
No fixed receptive-day schedule or PPS flowering readiness established.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
Abstract
Offspring evidence
Number of specimens not available in opened abstract.
Confidence rationale
Original abstract only.
Supporting sources
Flowering Behavior of the Neotropical Genus Anthurium (Araceae)
Author
["Thomas B. Croat"]
Source date
1980-07-01
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Publisher abstract only.
Supporting location
AmJBot67:888–904; abstract.
Studied material
Living Anthurium species
Organ
flowers/spadix
Generation
adult reproductive phase
Study design
Comparative flowering observations.
Sample information
Number of specimens not available in opened abstract.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Documented milestones

No dated milestones are supplied here yet

Attempts, cohort progress and offspring observations will remain separate records. No maturation or release countdown is inferred.

Offspring availability

No offspring release is listed here yet

Future prices, quantities, traits and timing are unconfirmed.

Loading the recorded collection

We are retrieving this view. No plant status or saved choice has changed.

The research intention

A distinctive texture hypothesis, but neither exact parent is proven reproductively usable. Large useful plants remain eligible; no compactness filter.

Feasibility assessment

Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed

Recorded attempts

Recorded cohorts

Observed outcomes

No PPS outcomes recorded

PPS next step

Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.

Commercial availability

Not yet offered

Last recorded update

Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Radicans x Luxurians XL

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

hj0735 moody x Veitchii

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.

Evidence reference: RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type: controlled genetic study
Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: Table2 p712
Offspring evidence: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale: Original Methods and outcome table available.

Supporting sources

Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium

Author: ["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1976-11
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location: JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Study design: Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

A. triangulum♀×A. digitatum♂ yielded a vigorous sterile hybrid; the reciprocal produced weak seedlings that died early.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.

Evidence reference: RE-136eb1fe82f0a3813b062ba0
Source type: controlled genetic study
Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: Not a PPS velvet-leaf pairing; does not identify the cause of directionality.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph
Offspring evidence: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale: Original reciprocal paragraph read.

Supporting sources

Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium

Author: ["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1976-11
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location: JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Study design: Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Anthurium commonly shows marked protogyny, with species differences in floral phases, stigmatic fluid and pollen presentation.Traceable observational record · Applicability: related lineage · Flower-event timing for PPS plants.

Evidence reference: RE-b2249f93f3fac28d3f01cc96
Source type: traceable observational record
Applicability: related lineage · Flower-event timing for PPS plants.
Studied material: Living Anthurium species
Organ: flowers/spadix
Generation: adult reproductive phase
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: No fixed receptive-day schedule or PPS flowering readiness established.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: Abstract
Offspring evidence: Number of specimens not available in opened abstract.
Confidence rationale: Original abstract only.

Supporting sources

Flowering Behavior of the Neotropical Genus Anthurium (Araceae)

Author: ["Thomas B. Croat"]
Source date: 1980-07-01
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Publisher abstract only.
Supporting location: AmJBot67:888–904; abstract.
Studied material: Living Anthurium species
Organ: flowers/spadix
Generation: adult reproductive phase
Study design: Comparative flowering observations.
Sample information: Number of specimens not available in opened abstract.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)