Directional cross

Seed PL-194 → Pollen PL-188 · Splendidum-related bridge fertility and useful surface

Splendidum-related bridge fertility and useful surface

Proposed not yet attemptedDirection: Seed to pollen

A proposed pairing does not establish compatibility, inherited traits, a completed attempt or future availability. Each direction is evaluated separately.

The research intention

Breeder catalogues provide indirect plausibility; actual PPS identity, fertility and survival are decisive. A hybrid label is not proof of bridge competence.

Feasibility assessment: Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed
Recorded attempts: 0
Recorded cohorts: 0
Observed outcomes: No PPS outcomes recorded
PPS next step: Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.
Commercial availability: Not yet offered
Last recorded update: Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

[3370] (Pap x Carla) x Splendidum

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

[(SKG dressleri x magnificum) x papillilaminum "Ft Sherman"] x carlablackiae "Tropicarla"

Provisional collection recordSeedlingUnresolved

Development: Seedling
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Evidence reference
RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type
controlled genetic study
Applicability
related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
Table2 p712
Offspring evidence
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale
Original Methods and outcome table available.
Supporting sources
Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium
Author
["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1976-11
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location
JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Study design
Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
A. triangulum♀×A. digitatum♂ yielded a vigorous sterile hybrid; the reciprocal produced weak seedlings that died early.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Evidence reference
RE-136eb1fe82f0a3813b062ba0
Source type
controlled genetic study
Applicability
distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
Not a PPS velvet-leaf pairing; does not identify the cause of directionality.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph
Offspring evidence
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale
Original reciprocal paragraph read.
Supporting sources
Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium
Author
["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1976-11
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location
JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Study design
Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
Accessory B counts, DNA amount, chromosome-set ploidy, visual leaf size and hybrid fertility are distinct measurements.Hypothesis · Applicability: related lineage · Interpretation safeguard for collection research.
Evidence reference
RE-dc5c80570dcd63dfa31521de
Source type
hypothesis
Applicability
related lineage · Interpretation safeguard for collection research.
Studied material
A. warocqueanum parent and selfed offspring | One A. warocqueanum parent and selfed family | 77 accessions; includes3 A. warocqueanum accessions
Organ
somatic chromosomes | somatic cells; pollen mother cells | mature leaf nuclei
Generation
parent/selfed offspring | parent/selfed offspring | accession survey
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
No PPS ploidy or fertility assigned; direct accession measurements needed.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
SCI-S003/004 abstracts; SCI-S007 Methods and Discussion
Offspring evidence
Parent2n=30+3B; abstract lacks progeny denominator. | One parent; offspring denominator not in abstract. | 81 sampled,4 provenance exclusions;77 analyzed;4 instrument readings/preparation;1000 nuclei/read.
Confidence rationale
Synthesis of cytological and genome-size studies, not a new experimental result.
Supporting sources
Karyotype and B chromosomes of Anthurium warocqueanum
Author
["K. Kaneko", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1979-07-01
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Publisher abstract opened through its minimal-content redirect; full paper not read.
Supporting location
Journal of Heredity70(4):271–272; abstract.
Studied material
A. warocqueanum parent and selfed offspring
Organ
somatic chromosomes
Generation
parent/selfed offspring
Study design
Cytogenetic transmission.
Sample information
Parent2n=30+3B; abstract lacks progeny denominator.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
Transmission and Significance of B Chromosomes in Anthurium warocqueanum
Author
["Mari Marutani", "Haruyuki Kamemoto"]
Source date
1983-01
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original abstract opened on PubMed; full article not read.
Supporting location
AmJBot70(1):40–46; abstract paragraphs1–3.
Studied material
One A. warocqueanum parent and selfed family
Organ
somatic cells; pollen mother cells
Generation
parent/selfed offspring
Study design
Somatic and meiotic cytogenetics.
Sample information
One parent; offspring denominator not in abstract.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
Genome size in Anthurium evaluated in the context of karyotypes and phenotypes
Author
["Barbara J. Bliss", "Jon Y. Suzuki"]
Source date
2012-02-29
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original full article read in author-uploaded ResearchGate text. Date is printed online-publication date.
Supporting location
AoBPlants2012:pls006; Methods pp2–3; Table1 pp4–6; Discussion.
Studied material
77 accessions; includes3 A. warocqueanum accessions
Organ
mature leaf nuclei
Generation
accession survey
Study design
Flow cytometry with internal standards; technical readings are not biological replicates.
Sample information
81 sampled,4 provenance exclusions;77 analyzed;4 instrument readings/preparation;1000 nuclei/read.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
The breeder catalogues pap/warocqueanum and several splendidum-related combinations, motivating a conditional bridge investigation rather than a claim of exact PPS compatibility.Traceable observational record · Applicability: related lineage · PL-183|PL-194|PL-188
Evidence reference
RE-aeb3a3994e18fbd7e23d4d59
Source type
traceable observational record
Applicability
related lineage · PL-183|PL-194|PL-188
Studied material
Breeder-labelled crosses, not PPS parents
Organ
reproduction
Generation
offspring labels only
Inheritance
unresolved
Limits
No proven exact-pair prediction; no deterministic bridge success
Contradictions
Unknown
Supporting source location
AAB003/005/012/017/019/025
Offspring evidence
No complete attempt, germination or later fertility denominators
Confidence rationale
Original breeder lists cross labels; parentage and later fertility unverified
Supporting sources
Anthurium Breeding
Author
AAB Exotics
Source date
Unknown
Accessed
2026-10-11
Access
Opened original breeder page, full listed crosses
Supporting location
Entries AAB003/005/012/017/019/025 and reciprocal labels AAB006/011
Studied material
Breeder-labelled pap/warocq and splendidum-related crosses
Organ
reproduction
Generation
labelled offspring; later fertility unavailable
Study design
Breeder cross catalogue
Sample information
Denominators and parentage verification absent
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Documented milestones

No dated milestones are supplied here yet

Attempts, cohort progress and offspring observations will remain separate records. No maturation or release countdown is inferred.

Offspring availability

No offspring release is listed here yet

Future prices, quantities, traits and timing are unconfirmed.

Loading the recorded collection

We are retrieving this view. No plant status or saved choice has changed.

The research intention

Breeder catalogues provide indirect plausibility; actual PPS identity, fertility and survival are decisive. A hybrid label is not proof of bridge competence.

Feasibility assessment

Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed

Recorded attempts

Recorded cohorts

Observed outcomes

No PPS outcomes recorded

PPS next step

Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.

Commercial availability

Not yet offered

Last recorded update

Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

[3370] (Pap x Carla) x Splendidum

Provisional collection recordUnknownUnresolved

Development: Unknown
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

[(SKG dressleri x magnificum) x papillilaminum "Ft Sherman"] x carlablackiae "Tropicarla"

Provisional collection recordSeedlingUnresolved

Development: Seedling
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.

Evidence reference: RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type: controlled genetic study
Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: Table2 p712
Offspring evidence: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale: Original Methods and outcome table available.

Supporting sources

Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium

Author: ["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1976-11
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location: JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Study design: Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

A. triangulum♀×A. digitatum♂ yielded a vigorous sterile hybrid; the reciprocal produced weak seedlings that died early.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.

Evidence reference: RE-136eb1fe82f0a3813b062ba0
Source type: controlled genetic study
Applicability: distant analogy · Reciprocal-cross design across Anthurium.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: Not a PPS velvet-leaf pairing; does not identify the cause of directionality.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph
Offspring evidence: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale: Original reciprocal paragraph read.

Supporting sources

Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium

Author: ["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1976-11
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location: JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Study design: Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Accessory B counts, DNA amount, chromosome-set ploidy, visual leaf size and hybrid fertility are distinct measurements.Hypothesis · Applicability: related lineage · Interpretation safeguard for collection research.

Evidence reference: RE-dc5c80570dcd63dfa31521de
Source type: hypothesis
Applicability: related lineage · Interpretation safeguard for collection research.
Studied material: A. warocqueanum parent and selfed offspring | One A. warocqueanum parent and selfed family | 77 accessions; includes3 A. warocqueanum accessions
Organ: somatic chromosomes | somatic cells; pollen mother cells | mature leaf nuclei
Generation: parent/selfed offspring | parent/selfed offspring | accession survey
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: No PPS ploidy or fertility assigned; direct accession measurements needed.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: SCI-S003/004 abstracts; SCI-S007 Methods and Discussion
Offspring evidence: Parent2n=30+3B; abstract lacks progeny denominator. | One parent; offspring denominator not in abstract. | 81 sampled,4 provenance exclusions;77 analyzed;4 instrument readings/preparation;1000 nuclei/read.
Confidence rationale: Synthesis of cytological and genome-size studies, not a new experimental result.

Supporting sources

Karyotype and B chromosomes of Anthurium warocqueanum

Author: ["K. Kaneko", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1979-07-01
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Publisher abstract opened through its minimal-content redirect; full paper not read.
Supporting location: Journal of Heredity70(4):271–272; abstract.
Studied material: A. warocqueanum parent and selfed offspring
Organ: somatic chromosomes
Generation: parent/selfed offspring
Study design: Cytogenetic transmission.
Sample information: Parent2n=30+3B; abstract lacks progeny denominator.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Transmission and Significance of B Chromosomes in Anthurium warocqueanum

Author: ["Mari Marutani", "Haruyuki Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1983-01
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original abstract opened on PubMed; full article not read.
Supporting location: AmJBot70(1):40–46; abstract paragraphs1–3.
Studied material: One A. warocqueanum parent and selfed family
Organ: somatic cells; pollen mother cells
Generation: parent/selfed offspring
Study design: Somatic and meiotic cytogenetics.
Sample information: One parent; offspring denominator not in abstract.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Genome size in Anthurium evaluated in the context of karyotypes and phenotypes

Author: ["Barbara J. Bliss", "Jon Y. Suzuki"]
Source date: 2012-02-29
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original full article read in author-uploaded ResearchGate text. Date is printed online-publication date.
Supporting location: AoBPlants2012:pls006; Methods pp2–3; Table1 pp4–6; Discussion.
Studied material: 77 accessions; includes3 A. warocqueanum accessions
Organ: mature leaf nuclei
Generation: accession survey
Study design: Flow cytometry with internal standards; technical readings are not biological replicates.
Sample information: 81 sampled,4 provenance exclusions;77 analyzed;4 instrument readings/preparation;1000 nuclei/read.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

The breeder catalogues pap/warocqueanum and several splendidum-related combinations, motivating a conditional bridge investigation rather than a claim of exact PPS compatibility.Traceable observational record · Applicability: related lineage · PL-183|PL-194|PL-188

Evidence reference: RE-aeb3a3994e18fbd7e23d4d59
Source type: traceable observational record
Applicability: related lineage · PL-183|PL-194|PL-188
Studied material: Breeder-labelled crosses, not PPS parents
Organ: reproduction
Generation: offspring labels only
Inheritance: unresolved
Limits: No proven exact-pair prediction; no deterministic bridge success
Contradictions: Unknown
Supporting source location: AAB003/005/012/017/019/025
Offspring evidence: No complete attempt, germination or later fertility denominators
Confidence rationale: Original breeder lists cross labels; parentage and later fertility unverified

Supporting sources

Anthurium Breeding

Author: AAB Exotics
Source date: Unknown
Accessed: 2026-10-11
Access: Opened original breeder page, full listed crosses
Supporting location: Entries AAB003/005/012/017/019/025 and reciprocal labels AAB006/011
Studied material: Breeder-labelled pap/warocq and splendidum-related crosses
Organ: reproduction
Generation: labelled offspring; later fertility unavailable
Study design: Breeder cross catalogue
Sample information: Denominators and parentage verification absent
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)