Selfing

Seed PL-172 → Pollen PL-172 · Self offspring variation of RVC24 self-labelled individual

Self offspring variation of RVC24 self-labelled individual

Proposed not yet attemptedDirection: Seed to pollen

A proposed pairing does not establish compatibility, inherited traits, a completed attempt or future availability. Each direction is evaluated separately.

The research intention

Compare repeated parent leaves and all progeny; a reported 24 x 24 origin does not predict uniformity of a self of this offspring.

Feasibility assessment: Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed
Recorded attempts: 0
Recorded cohorts: 0
Observed outcomes: No PPS outcomes recorded
PPS next step: Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.
Commercial availability: Not yet offered
Last recorded update: Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Doc Block RVC 24 x RVC 24

Provisional collection recordMature by recorded assessmentUnresolved

Development: Mature by recorded assessment
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Doc Block RVC 24 x RVC 24

Provisional collection recordMature by recorded assessmentUnresolved

Development: Mature by recorded assessment
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

RPF distinguishes crosses between divisions of one genotype from crosses between seed-grown siblings.Marketing/anecdotal claim · Applicability: distant analogy / general method · No specific target recorded
Evidence reference
RE-b6f0761e9fc3a5093a85361c
Source type
marketing/anecdotal claim
Applicability
distant analogy / general method · No specific target recorded
Studied material
Selfing versus clones
Organ
leaf/lineage unless specified
Generation
See claim/source; not PPS-verified
Inheritance
unresolved
Limits
Educational explanation, not a PPS lineage test. Its pea ratios are illustrative and cannot predict foliage traits in these complex hybrids.
Contradictions
Unknown
Supporting source location
See linked source passage locator
Offspring evidence
Not reported; see sample notes in primary package
Confidence rationale
Traceable source content; limited applicability and no exact PPS segregation model
Supporting sources
What Does Selfing Actually Mean in Anthurium Breeding?
Author
Jocelyn Ho
Source date
2026-02-24 (date on blog index)
Accessed
2026-10-11
Access
opened text
Supporting location
Article sections distinguishing genotype, clone divisions and seedlings, lines 47–92; byline line 99
Studied material
Grower educational article; its pea example is not Anthurium trait evidence.
Organ
see linked claim
Generation
see linked claim
Study design
Breeder narrative, patent or original product description; see claim
Sample information
See claims; no exact PPS progeny dataset
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
Patent describes four selfed generations, roughly 250–500 seedlings per generation, followed by selection for foliage contrast and vigor.Traceable observational record · Applicability: verified named cultivar document; PPS exact clone unresolved · PL-058
Evidence reference
RE-be986f598753b17fe82868d0
Source type
traceable observational record
Applicability
verified named cultivar document; PPS exact clone unresolved · PL-058
Studied material
BLOCANTMIC selection record
Organ
leaf upper/lower surfaces, venation; whole-plant vigor
Generation
See claim/source; not PPS-verified
Inheritance
unresolved
Limits
Reported breeding history lacks trait-category counts and individual pedigrees; it supports selection, not Mendelian ratios.
Contradictions
Unknown
Supporting source location
See linked source passage locator
Offspring evidence
Not reported; see sample notes in primary package
Confidence rationale
Traceable source content; limited applicability and no exact PPS segregation model
Supporting sources
Anthurium plant named ‘BLOCANTMIC’ — US PP36,544
Author
Jeffrey Sherwood Block
Source date
Grant 2025-03-11; filed 2024-05-15
Accessed
2026-10-11
Access
opened text
Supporting location
Background lines 52–55; observations lines 75–77; resistance line 90; reproduction lines 164–166; comparison lines 169–176
Studied material
Primary patent document via reproduction. Official USPTO bibliographic entry opened separately. No raw progeny table or allele testing.
Organ
see linked claim
Generation
see linked claim
Study design
Breeder narrative, patent or original product description; see claim
Sample information
See claims; no exact PPS progeny dataset
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)
The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Evidence reference
RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type
controlled genetic study
Applicability
related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance
unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits
Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions
No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location
Table2 p712
Offspring evidence
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale
Original Methods and outcome table available.
Supporting sources
Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium
Author
["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date
1976-11
Accessed
2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access
Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location
JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material
University of Hawaii species collection
Organ
reproduction; progeny
Generation
self/interspecific offspring
Study design
Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information
1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator
Unknown
Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Documented milestones

No dated milestones are supplied here yet

Attempts, cohort progress and offspring observations will remain separate records. No maturation or release countdown is inferred.

Offspring availability

No offspring release is listed here yet

Future prices, quantities, traits and timing are unconfirmed.

Loading the recorded collection

We are retrieving this view. No plant status or saved choice has changed.

The research intention

Compare repeated parent leaves and all progeny; a reported 24 x 24 origin does not predict uniformity of a self of this offspring.

Feasibility assessment

Compatibility, flower phase and fertility unconfirmed

Recorded attempts

Recorded cohorts

Observed outcomes

No PPS outcomes recorded

PPS next step

Authenticate the parent identities and record readiness before any attempted pollination.

Commercial availability

Not yet offered

Last recorded update

Unknown

What remains uncertain · 4

Compatibility unconfirmed
Offspring characteristics unconfirmed
No PPS pollination attempt or offspring outcome recorded
Source candidates are not physically authenticated breeding parents

Proposed sources

Seed-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Doc Block RVC 24 x RVC 24

Provisional collection recordMature by recorded assessmentUnresolved

Development: Mature by recorded assessment
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Pollen-source candidate

Photo pendingNo approved photograph is available for this record yet.

Doc Block RVC 24 x RVC 24

Provisional collection recordMature by recorded assessmentUnresolved

Development: Mature by recorded assessment
Breeding role: Long term candidate

Evidence and applicability

RPF distinguishes crosses between divisions of one genotype from crosses between seed-grown siblings.Marketing/anecdotal claim · Applicability: distant analogy / general method · No specific target recorded

Evidence reference: RE-b6f0761e9fc3a5093a85361c
Source type: marketing/anecdotal claim
Applicability: distant analogy / general method · No specific target recorded
Studied material: Selfing versus clones
Organ: leaf/lineage unless specified
Generation: See claim/source; not PPS-verified
Inheritance: unresolved
Limits: Educational explanation, not a PPS lineage test. Its pea ratios are illustrative and cannot predict foliage traits in these complex hybrids.
Contradictions: Unknown
Supporting source location: See linked source passage locator
Offspring evidence: Not reported; see sample notes in primary package
Confidence rationale: Traceable source content; limited applicability and no exact PPS segregation model

Supporting sources

What Does Selfing Actually Mean in Anthurium Breeding?

Author: Jocelyn Ho
Source date: 2026-02-24 (date on blog index)
Accessed: 2026-10-11
Access: opened text
Supporting location: Article sections distinguishing genotype, clone divisions and seedlings, lines 47–92; byline line 99
Studied material: Grower educational article; its pea example is not Anthurium trait evidence.
Organ: see linked claim
Generation: see linked claim
Study design: Breeder narrative, patent or original product description; see claim
Sample information: See claims; no exact PPS progeny dataset
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

Patent describes four selfed generations, roughly 250–500 seedlings per generation, followed by selection for foliage contrast and vigor.Traceable observational record · Applicability: verified named cultivar document; PPS exact clone unresolved · PL-058

Evidence reference: RE-be986f598753b17fe82868d0
Source type: traceable observational record
Applicability: verified named cultivar document; PPS exact clone unresolved · PL-058
Studied material: BLOCANTMIC selection record
Organ: leaf upper/lower surfaces, venation; whole-plant vigor
Generation: See claim/source; not PPS-verified
Inheritance: unresolved
Limits: Reported breeding history lacks trait-category counts and individual pedigrees; it supports selection, not Mendelian ratios.
Contradictions: Unknown
Supporting source location: See linked source passage locator
Offspring evidence: Not reported; see sample notes in primary package
Confidence rationale: Traceable source content; limited applicability and no exact PPS segregation model

Supporting sources

Anthurium plant named ‘BLOCANTMIC’ — US PP36,544

Author: Jeffrey Sherwood Block
Source date: Grant 2025-03-11; filed 2024-05-15
Accessed: 2026-10-11
Access: opened text
Supporting location: Background lines 52–55; observations lines 75–77; resistance line 90; reproduction lines 164–166; comparison lines 169–176
Studied material: Primary patent document via reproduction. Official USPTO bibliographic entry opened separately. No raw progeny table or allele testing.
Organ: see linked claim
Generation: see linked claim
Study design: Breeder narrative, patent or original product description; see claim
Sample information: See claims; no exact PPS progeny dataset
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)

The study records fruiting spadices, germination and flowering progeny separately; GroupV interspecific outcomes were131 pollinations,59 fruiting spadices and38 flowering progenies.Controlled genetic study · Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.

Evidence reference: RE-21da39ed089cbf83686a59f2
Source type: controlled genetic study
Applicability: related lineage · Velvet-leaf collection: process design, not exact PPS pair prediction.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Inheritance: unknown unless explicitly stated
Limits: Historical grouping, selective availability and sampled offspring constrain extrapolation.
Contradictions: No contradictions recorded
Supporting source location: Table2 p712
Offspring evidence: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Confidence rationale: Original Methods and outcome table available.

Supporting sources

Cross Compatibility in the Genus Anthurium

Author: ["R. D. Sheffer", "H. Kamemoto"]
Source date: 1976-11
Accessed: 2026-10-11T19:30:36.371253+00:00
Access: Original article full text read in ResearchGate OCR reproduction; publisher inaccessible.
Supporting location: JASHS101(6):709–713; Methods; Table2; p712 reciprocal-cross paragraph.
Studied material: University of Hawaii species collection
Organ: reproduction; progeny
Generation: self/interspecific offspring
Study design: Controlled crosses; availability-constrained matrix; historical taxonomy.
Sample information: 1592 pollinations; abstract56 species, Methods57; germination sample25 seeds/cross;8 seedlings/cross grown onward.
Denominator: Unknown

Read cited source (opens a new tab)